377A
Well, looks like our glorious nation has decided to keep the law criminalizing buttseks after all. Here are some quotes, snagged from Popagandhi, from Nominated MP Thio Li-Ann.

Anal-penetrative sex is inherently damaging to the body and a misuse of organs, like shoving a straw up your nose to drink. The anus is designed to expel waste; when something is forcibly inserted into it, the muscles contract and cause tearing; fecal waste, viruses carried by sperm and blood thus congregate, with adverse health implications like ‘gay bowel syndrome’, anal cancer. ‘Acts of gross indecency’ under 377A also covers unhygienic practices like “rimming” where the mouth comes into contact with the anus. Consent to harmful acts is no defence – otherwise, our strong anti-drug laws must fall as it cannot co-exist with letting in recreational drugs as a matter of personal lifestyle choice [..] Opposite-sex sodomy is harmful, but medical studies indicate that same-sex sodomy carries a higher price tag for society because of higher promiscuity and frequency levels.

[...]

Second, while homosexuals are a numerical minority, there is no such thing as ‘sexual minorities’ at law. Activists have coined this term to draw a beguiling but fallacious association between homosexuals and legally recognized minorities like racial groups. Race is a fixed trait. It remains controversial whether homosexual orientation is genetic or environmental, perhaps both. There are no ex-Blacks but there are ex-gays. The analogy between race and sexual orientation or preferred sexual preferences, is false. Activists repeat the slogan ‘sexual minority’ ad nausem as a deceptive political ploy to get sympathy from people who don’t think through issues carefully [...] While we cherish racial and religious diversity, sexual diversity is a different kettle of fish. Diversity is not license for perversity. This radical liberal argument is pernicious, a leftist philosophy based on radical individualism and radical egalitarianism. It is unworkable because every viable moral theory has limits to consent.

Ah, where to begin, where to begin. Let's start with fasting.

Fasting is inherently damaging to the body and a misuse of organs, like, well, not eating when you have a belly. The human body was designed (designed my ass, wtf is the vermiform appendix for?) has evolved to consume food, extract nutrients from it, and then crap the remainder out; when humans choose to not eat, gastric juices in your stomach have nothing to digest and start digesting your stomach walls. This can lead to extreme hunger pangs and gastric pains.

I wonder who's the next target? Would the esteemed NMP be interested in campaigning for criminalizing fasting next? After all, there are ex-Muslims but no ex-blacks.

Let's take an even more ridiculous example. Human teeth and nails were designed were evolved to engage other living creatures in mortal combat. Not doing so results in weaker teeth and nails, hence we should also have a law criminalizing not fighting wild beasts with tooth and nail on a regular basis. Lions, tigers and elephants (oh my!) should therefore be imported just for that purpose.

Bah. Humbug.

Labels: 377A

  ¶
Permalink

If you don't like what I say, why not subscribe me for some porn?